Adjusting starting points for initial price offers: the example of ibrutinib.

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) allows the Medicare program to negotiate drug prices beginning in 2024. Based on the guidance in the statute, CMS has selected specific data items to use to adjust initial price offers for 10 drugs in the decision-making process. Although much of the data are publicly available, some of these data items will need to be collected directly from drug companies. A 2019 US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Accountability investigative report collected a wide range of data from manufacturers of 12 high-revenue drugs that show what is available from the drug companies, including development costs, marketing, pricing, competition, and patent status. This article focuses on the data obtained for ibrutinib, an oral medication for treating hematologic malignancies, which is one of the only drugs reviewed by the committee that also has been selected for Medicare price negotiation. We examine data that can be obtained only from the drug manufacturer that the IRA has explicitly identified as being used to determine the price and suggest potential negotiation strategies for CMS in response.

Hospitalizations Among Veterans Treated for Metastatic Prostate Cancer With Abiraterone or Enzalutamide.

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone and enzalutamide are second generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) used to treat advanced or metastatic prostate cancer. Without head-to-head comparative studies identifying 1 agent as preferred initial therapy, physician preferences guide initial ARPI choice. This study compares hospitalizations among patients treated initially with abiraterone versus enzalutamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: United States veterans treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide between May 13, 2011 and December 31, 2019; then compared hospitalization rate during first treatment with ARPI in the Veterans Healthcare Administration. Baseline incidence rate of hospitalization was determined from data 1 year prior to ARPI. Incidence Rate Difference (IRD) was calculated using χ2 test and difference in IRD using Poisson Regression. RESULTS: 19,775 veterans were identified; 13,527 (68.4%) were initially treated with abiraterone and 6248 (31.6%) initially with enzalutamide. The enzalutamide cohort was older (75.8 vs. 74.5 years, P < .001) and had higher baseline comorbidities at ARPI initiation (4.4 vs. 4.0, P < .001). Patients were treated with enzalutamide longer than abiraterone (median 9.0 vs. 8.0 months, P < .001). Total hospitalizations increased from 465 per 1000 person-years in the year prior to treatment with abiraterone to 567 during treatment. Total hospitalizations increased from 417 per 1000 person-years in the year prior to treatment with enzalutamide to 430 during treatment. Total rate of hospitalization increased 22% for abiraterone compared to a 3% increase for enzalutamide in the 12 months after ARPI initiation (P < .0001). Abiraterone was associated with greater increase in rates of acute heart failure, atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury, urinary tract infections, sepsis, and pneumonia. CONCLUSION: By comparing the rate of hospitalization before vs. during treatment, real world analyses identified a 22% versus 3% increase in hospitalizations with abiraterone compared to enzalutamide respectively, despite being used in a younger population with less comorbid disease. Abiraterone was also associated with higher risk of infections, a novel finding.

Survival of veterans treated with enzalutamide and abiraterone for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer based on comorbid diseases.

BACKGROUND: Comorbid diseases influence patient outcomes, yet little is known about how comorbidities interact with treatments for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). No head-to-head trials have compared the efficacy of abiraterone and enzalutamide - oral androgen-receptor targeted agents (ARTAs) for mCRPC. In patients with comorbid disease, outcomes with ARTAs may differ due to disparate mechanisms of action, adverse events, and drug interactions. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of US veterans initiating treatment for mCRPC with abiraterone or enzalutamide between September 2014 and June 2017. Treatment duration and overall survival (OS) was compared based on age and comorbid diseases. The association between ARTA and OS was assessed using Cox proportional hazards and propensity-score matched modeling while adjusting for potential confounders. Sensitivity analyses were performed based on patient age, comorbidities, and subsequent treatments for mCRPC. RESULTS: Of 5822 veterans treated for mCRPC, 43.0% initially received enzalutamide and 57.0% abiraterone. Veterans initially treated with enzalutamide versus abiraterone were older (mean 75.8 vs. 75.0 years) with higher mean Charlson comorbidity index (4.4 vs. 4.1), and higher rates of cardiovascular disease or diabetes (74.2% vs. 70.6%). In the entire population, veterans initially treated with enzalutamide had longer median OS compared to those initially treated with abiraterone (24.2 vs. 22.1 months, p = 0.001). In veterans with cardiovascular disease or diabetes, median treatment duration with enzalutamide was longer (11.4 vs. 8.6 months, p < 0.001) with longer median OS compared to abiraterone (23.2 vs. 20.5 months, p < 0.001). In a propensity score matched cohort, enzalutamide was associated with decreased mortality compared to abiraterone (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Veterans with cardiovascular disease or diabetes had longer treatment duration and OS with enzalutamide compared to abiraterone. Further study of ARTA selection may benefit men with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer and likely hormone sensitive prostate cancer, especially among patients with comorbid diseases.

Was There Something Rotten in Denmark: Nephrogenic System Fibrosis Cases Occurring in Copenhagen.

More than half of all serious adverse drug reactions are identified seven years after FDA approval. One recent and unusual example involves a syndrome initially termed nephrogenic dermatopathic fibrosis, and then called nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF).

Rituximab-Associated Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy: A Twenty-Year Update.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a John-Cunningham virus-related central nervous system that is rarely observed in persons treated with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab.

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma: Report from the prospective international T-cell lymphoma project.

The T-cell Lymphoma Project is an international registry prospective study that enrolled patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas (PTCL). The main objective was to define the clinical features and outcomes, establishing a robust benchmark for future clinical trials. Seventy-four institutions from 14 countries in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia collected data on patients diagnosed and treated at their respective centers between September 2006 and February 2018. Among 1553 PTCL patients, 131 (8.4% of the total cohort) were confirmed to have anaplastic large cell lymphoma - kinase positive (ALCL, ALK+). The median age of the patients was 39 years (18-84). Sixty-five patients (66%) had advanced-stage disease, although majority (45 patients, 54%) had a low-risk International Prognostic Index (IPI) score (0-1). Of 97 patients treated with chemotherapy, 97% received anthracycline-containing regimens. The overall response rate was 81%, with 69 patients (70%) achieving complete remission. Estimated OS and PFS at 3 years were 77% (95% CI: 54%-99%) and 68% (95% CI: 46%-90%), respectively, and at 5 years were very similar, 77% of OS (95% CI: 62%-92%) and 64% of PFS (95% CI: 34%-94%). Multivariate analysis for PFS showed advanced stage (hazard ratios [HR]: 4.72, 95% CI: 1.43-23.9, p = 0.015), elevated lactate dehidrogenade (LDH) (HR 4.85; 95% CI: 1.73-13.60, p = 0.001), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scale (ECOG-PS) ≥2 (HR: 5.25; 95% CI: 1.68-16.4, p = 0.024). For OS, elevated LDH (HR: 3.77; 95% CI: 1.98-14.17, p = 0.014) and ECOG-PS ≥2 (HR: 4.59; 95% CI: 1.46-14.39, p = 0.004) were identified. In summary, although the outcome of ALK+ ALCL is superior to that of other PTCLs, it remains sufficiently favorable, given the young median age of the patients. Our results confirm the usefulness of both IPI and Prognostic Index for T-cell Lymphoma (PIT) in identifying groups of patients with different outcomes. Clinical Trials ID: NCT01142674.

Evaluation of the Khorana score for prediction of venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the optimal risk prediction model for VTE in MM remains unclear. Khorana et al developed a VTE risk score (Khorana score) in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of the Khorana score in patients with MM. METHODS: We identified patients with MM within the Veterans Affairs health care system between 2006 and 2013. The Khorana score was calculated before treatment initiation. Using logistic regression, the relationship between risk group and VTE was assessed at 3 and 6 months. We tested model discrimination using the concordance statistic. RESULTS: In the cohort of 2870 patients with MM, there were 1328 at low risk (0 points), 1521 at intermediate risk (1-2 points), and 21 at high risk (≥3 points) for VTE by the Khorana score. The 6-month cumulative incidence of VTE was 5.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0%-6.4%) in low risk, 3.9% (95% CI, 3.0%-5.0%) in intermediate risk, 4.8% (95% CI, 0.3%-20.2%) in high risk. The Khorana score did not strongly discriminate between patients who did and did not develop VTEs at 3 or 6 months (concordance statistic, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.54-0.63; and 0.53, 95% CI, 0.50-0.57, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in this cohort of 2870 patients with MM, the Khorana score did not predict VTE. Our study supports the need to use myeloma-specific risk models to predict VTE risk in patients with MM.

Real-World Data of Palbociclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer in Men.

This report examined the benefits and risks of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) in men with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Palbociclib was evaluated using three independent data sources: real-world data from pharmacy and medical claims, a de-identified real-world data source derived from electronic health records (EHRs), and a global safety database. From medical and pharmacy records, 1,139 men with MBC were identified; in the first-line setting, median duration of treatment was longer with palbociclib plus ET (n = 37, 8.5 months, 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.4-13.0) than ET alone (n = 214, 4.3 months, 95% CI, 3.0-5.7) and specifically, was longer with palbociclib plus letrozole (n = 26, 9.4 months, 95% CI, 4.4-14.0) than letrozole alone (n = 63, 3.0 months, 95% CI, 1.8-4.8). In the EHR-derived database, 59 men received treatment for MBC; real-world response across all lines of therapy in the metastatic setting was reported in 4 of 12 patients (33.3%) in the palbociclib plus ET group vs. 1 of 8 (12.5%) patients in the ET group. Review of the global safety database did not identify any new safety signals in palbociclib-treated men. Real-world data indicated that men with MBC benefit from palbociclib plus ET, with a safety profile consistent with previous observations in women with MBC. Collective data on palbociclib in women and men in this report, including clinical trial data, real-world data, and a well-established risk/benefit profile, led to US approval of an expansion of the palbociclib indication to include men with MBC.

Characteristics and Outcome of Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma in North America: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Experience.

BACKGROUND: Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is rare and clinical data from non-Asian countries are lacking. It is unclear whether outcomes and disease natural history is similar to reported Asian series. We assessed characteristics and outcomes of patients with ENKTL from major North American centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with newly-diagnosed CD56 + ENKTL and studied disease characteristics and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one patients with ENKTL diagnosed between June 1990 and November 2012 were identified. Eighty-three patients (69%) had stage I/II disease and were treated with combined modality therapy (CMT) (n = 53), chemotherapy alone (CT) (n = 14) or radiotherapy alone (RT) (n = 16).  Thirty-eight patients (31%) had stage III/IV disease and were treated with CMT (n = 12), CT (n = 23), or RT (n = 3).  The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 51 months. Patients with stage I/II disease, compared to those with stage III/IV disease, had superior 2-year progression free survival (PFS) 43% vs 19% (P = .03) and overall survival (OS) 59% vs. 29% (P= .004). Outcomes were similar for stage I/II patients who received CMT vs. RT alone with 2-year PFS (53% vs. 47%; P= .91) and OS (67% vs. 67%; P= .58). No significant differences in outcomes were noted based on race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: This series represents a large experience of ENKTL treated at several major North American academic centers.  Our data are consistent with Asian studies: (1) majority of patients present with early-stage disease; (2) overall poor outcome regardless of race/ethnicity; (3) CMT likely yields favorable outcomes for suitable candidates with early-stage disease.

Characteristics and Outcome of Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma in North America: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Experience.

BACKGROUND: Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is rare and clinicaldata from non-Asian countries are lacking. It is unclear whether outcomes and diseasenatural history is similar to reported Asian series. We assessed characteristics and outcomes of patients with ENKTL from major North American centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with newly-diagnosedCD56 + ENKTL and studied disease characteristics and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: 121 patients with ENKTL diagnosed between June 1990 and November 2012 were identified. Eighty-three patients (69%) had stage I/II disease and were treatedwith combined modality therapy (CMT) (n=53), chemotherapy alone (CT) (n=14) orradiotherapy alone (RT) (n=16). Thirty-eight patients (31%) had stage III/IV diseaseand were treated with CMT (n=12), CT (n=23), or RT (n=3). The median follow-up forthe entire cohort was 51 months. Patients with stage I/II disease, compared to thosewith stage III/IV disease, had superior 2-year progression free survival (PFS) 43% vs19% (p=0.03) and overall survival (OS) 59% vs 29% (p=0.004). Outcomes were similarfor stage I/II patients who received CMT vs RT alone with 2-year PFS (53% vs 47%;p=0.91) and OS (67% vs 67%; p=0.58). No significant differences in outcomes werenoted based on race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: This series represents a large experience of ENKTL treated at several major North American academic centers. OUR DATA ARE CONSISTENT WITH ASIAN STUDIES: 1) majority of patients present with early-stage disease; 2) overall poor outcome regardless of race/ethnicity; 3) CMT likely yields favorable outcomes for suitable candidates with early-stage disease.

Consequences to patients, clinicians, and manufacturers when very serious adverse drug reactions are identified (1997-2019): A qualitative analysis from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR).

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug/device reactions (ADRs) can result in severe patient harm. We define very serious ADRs as being associated with severe toxicity, as measured on the Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE)) scale, following use of drugs or devices with large sales, large financial settlements, and large numbers of injured persons. We report on impacts on patients, clinicians, and manufacturers following very serious ADR reporting. METHODS: We reviewed clinician identified very serious ADRs published between 1997 and 2019. Drugs and devices associated with reports of very serious ADRs were identified. Included drugs or devices had market removal discussed at Food and Drug Advisory (FDA) Advisory Committee meetings, were published by clinicians, had sales > $1 billion, were associated with CTCAE Grade 4 or 5 toxicity effects, and had either >$1 billion in settlements or >1,000 injured patients. Data sources included journals, Congressional transcripts, and news reports. We reviewed data on: 1) timing of ADR reports, Boxed warnings, and product withdrawals, and 2) patient, clinician, and manufacturer impacts. Binomial analysis was used to compare sales pre- and post-FDA Advisory Committee meetings. FINDINGS: Twenty very serious ADRs involved fifteen drugs and one device. Legal settlements totaled $38.4 billion for 753,900 injured persons. Eleven of 18 clinicians (61%) reported harms, including verbal threats from manufacturer (five) and loss of a faculty position (one). Annual sales decreased 94% from $29.1 billion pre-FDA meeting to $4.9 billion afterwards (p<0.0018). Manufacturers of four drugs paid $1.7 billion total in criminal fines for failing to inform the FDA and physicians about very serious ADRs. Following FDA approval, the median time to ADR reporting was 7.5 years (Interquartile range 3,13 years). Twelve drugs received Box warnings and one drug received a warning (median, 7.5 years following ADR reporting (IQR 5,11 years). Six drugs and 1 device were withdrawn from marketing (median, 5 years after ADR reporting (IQR 4,6 years)). INTERPRETATION: Because very serious ADRs impacts are so large, policy makers should consider developing independently funded pharmacovigilance centers of excellence to assist with clinician investigations. FUNDING: This work received support from the National Cancer Institute (1R01 CA102713 (CLB), https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/nih-almanac/national-cancer-institute-nci; and two Pilot Project grants from the American Cancer Society's Institutional Grant Award to the University of South Carolina (IRG-13-043-01) https://www.cancer.org/ (SH; BS).

The First 2 Years of Biosimilar Epoetin for Cancer and Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in the U.S.: A Review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions.

Biosimilars are biologic drug products that are highly similar to reference products in analytic features, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy. Biosimilar epoetin received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2018. The manufacturer received an FDA nonapproval letter in 2017, despite receiving a favorable review by FDA's Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) and an FDA nonapproval letter in 2015 for an earlier formulation. We discuss the 2018 FDA approval, the 2017 FDA ODAC Committee review, and the FDA complete response letters in 2015 and 2017; review concepts of litigation, naming, labeling, substitution, interchangeability, and pharmacovigilance; review European and U.S. oncology experiences with biosimilar epoetin; and review the safety of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. In 2020, policy statements from AETNA, United Health Care, and Humana indicated that new epoetin oncology starts must be for biosimilar epoetin unless medical need for other epoetins is documented. Empirical studies report that as of 2012, reference epoetin use decreased from 40%-60% of all patients with cancer with chemotherapy-induced anemia to <5% of such patients because of safety concerns. Between 2018 and 2020, biosimilar epoetin use varied, increasing to 81% among one private insurer's patients covered by Medicare whose cancer care is administered with Oncology Analytics and to 41% with the same private insurer's patients with cancer covered by commercial health insurance and administered by the private insurer, to 0% in several Veterans Administration Hospitals, increasing to 100% in one large county hospital in California, and with yet-to-be-reported data from most oncology settings. We conclude that biosimilar epoetin appears to have overcome some barriers since 2015, although current uptake in the U.S. is variable. Pricing and safety considerations for all erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are primary determinants of biosimilar epoetin oncology uptake. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Few oncologists understand substitution and interchangeability of biosimilars with reference drugs. Epoetin biosimilar is new to the market, and physician and patient understanding is limited. The development of epoetin biosimilar is not familiar to oncologists.

Venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma is associated with increased mortality.

BACKGROUND: In multiple myeloma, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common, and treatments for myeloma, such as lenalidomide, increase the risk of thrombosis while improving survival. The association between VTE and survival is not well known. OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between VTE and survival in multiple myeloma (MM) while adjusting for known confounders that affect risk of thrombosis and survival, including patient characteristics and treatment in a retrospective cohort of US veterans. PATIENTS/METHODS: A cohort of patients with newly diagnosed MM treated within Veterans Health Administration between September 1, 1999, and June 30, 2014, was created to assess the association between VTE and mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling while accounting for known prognostic factors and treatments. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 4446 patients with myeloma, including 2837 patients diagnosed after lenalidomide approval in July 2006. VTE occurred in 327 (7.4%) patients within 1 year and occurred at a median of 77 days (interquartile range, 37-153) after starting therapy for MM. In all patients, VTE was associated with increased mortality at 6 months (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-2.37). Patients in the post-lenalidomide cohort with VTE had an increased mortality at both 6 months (aHR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.52-3.51) and 12 months (aHR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.19-2.33) after treatment initiation. DISCUSSION: This study shows that VTE during the first 6-12 months of therapy is associated with increased mortality in patients with MM. Studies evaluating thromboprophylaxis in patients at high risk of thrombosis are needed.

Prevalence of High Tumor Mutational Burden and Association With Survival in Patients With Less Common Solid Tumors.

Importance: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a potential biomarker associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. The prognostic value associated with TMB in the absence of immunotherapy is uncertain. Objective: To assess the prevalence of high TMB (TMB-H) and its association with overall survival (OS) among patients not treated with immunotherapy with the same 10 tumor types from the KEYNOTE-158 study. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the prognostic value of TMB-H, assessed by Foundation Medicine (FMI) and defined as at least 10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb) in the absence of immunotherapy. Data were sourced from the deidentified Flatiron Health-FMI clinicogenomic database collected up to July 31, 2018. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with any of the following solid cancer types: anal, biliary, endometrial, cervical, vulvar, small cell lung, thyroid, salivary gland, mesothelioma, or neuroendocrine tumor. Patients with microsatellite instability-high tumors were excluded from primary analysis. For OS analysis, patients were excluded if immunotherapy started on the FMI report date or earlier or if patients died before January 1, 2012, and patients were censored if immunotherapy was started later than the FMI report date. Data were analyzed from November 2018 to February 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for age, sex, cancer types, practice type, and albumin level. Results: Of 2589 eligible patients, 1671 (64.5%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 63.7 (11.7) years. Median (interquartile range) TMB was 2.6 (1.7-6.1) mut/Mb, and 332 patients (12.8%) had TMB-H (≥10 mut/Mb). Prevalence of TMB-H was highest among patients with small cell lung cancer (40.0%; 95% CI, 34.7%-45.6%) and neuroendocrine tumor (29.3%; 95% CI, 22.8%-36.6%) and lowest was among patients with mesothelioma (1.2%; 95% CI, 0.3%-4.4%) and thyroid cancer (2.7%; 95% CI, 1.2%-5.7%). Adjusted hazard ratio for OS of patients not treated with immunotherapy with TMB-H vs those without TMB-H was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.77-1.13). Comparable results were observed when including patients with high microsatellite instability tumors and calculating OS from first observed antineoplastic treatment date. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that prevalence of TMB-H varies widely depending on tumor type and TMB-H does not appear to be a factor associated with OS among patients across these cancer types treated in the absence of immunotherapy.

End of an era of administering erythropoiesis stimulating agents among Veterans Administration cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Erythropoisis stimulating agent (ESA) use was addressed in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Oncology Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) meetings between 2004 and 2008. FDA safety-focused regulatory actions occurred in 2007 and 2008. In 2007, black box warnings advised of early death and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risks with ESAs in oncology. In 2010, a Risk Evaluation Strategies (REMS) was initiated, with cancer patient consent that mortality and VTE risks were noted with ESAs. We report warnings and REMS impacts on ESA utilization among Veterans Administration (VA) cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Data were from Veterans Affairs database (2003-2012). Epoetin and darbepoetin use were primary outcomes. Segmented linear regression was used to estimate changes in ESA use levels and trends, clinical appropriateness, and adverse events (VTEs) among chemotherapy-treated cancer patients. To estimate changes in level of drug prescription rate after policy actions, model-specific indicator variables as covariates based on specific actions were included. ESA use fell by 95% and 90% from 2005, for epoetin and darbepoetin, from 22% and 11%, respectively, to 1% and 1%, respectively, among cancer patients with CIA, respectively (p<0.01). Following REMS in 2010, mean hematocrit levels at ESA initiation decreased from 30% to 21% (p<0.01). Black box warnings preceded decreased ESA use among VA cancer patients with CIA. REMS was followed by reduced hematocrit levels at ESA initiation. Our findings contrast with privately- insured and Medicaid insured cancer patient data on chemotherapy-induced anemia where ESA use decreased to 3% to 7% by 2010-2012. By 2012, the era of ESA administration to VA to cancer patients had ended but the warnings remain relevant and significant. In 2019, oncology/hematology national guidelines (ASCO/ASH) recommend that cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia should receive ESAs or red blood cell transfusions after risk-benefit evaluation.

Outcomes of Patients with Transformed Mycosis Fungoides: Analysis from a Prospective Multicenter US Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: We examined patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with transformed mycosis fungoides (tMF) from COMPLETE: a large, multicenter, prospective cohort study of peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients in the United States. METHODS: Patients with tMF were enrolled in COMPLETE at the time of transformation. For this analysis, we identified patients with tMF with completed baseline, treatment, and follow-up records. Median survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methodology. RESULTS: Of the 499 patients enrolled in COMPLETE, 17 had tMF. Median age was 61; 53% were male, 9 had elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and 9 had lymph node involvement. Approximately one-quarter of the patients were African American and 47% had CD30+ disease. Median time to transformation was 53 months. All patients received systemic therapy, with 19% receiving concomitant radiotherapy. Most patients (87%) received single agents, including liposomal doxorubicin, pralatrexate, and gemcitabine. Eight patients (50%) had reported responses to therapy. Median survival was 18 months. One- and 2-year survival rates were 56% and 44%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: tMF often expresses CD30 and presents with lymph node involvement. Responses have been seen with single agents, but survival remains poor. Novel treatment approaches are urgently needed to improve outcomes.

Clinical and Genomic Characteristics of Small Cell Lung Cancer in Never Smokers: Results From a Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has the strongest association with smoking among lung cancers. The characteristics of never smokers with SCLC is not known. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, survival, genomic alterations, and tumor mutational burdens of SCLC in patients who have never smoked different from those who have smoked? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with clinician-confirmed SCLC was performed with the use of a longitudinal and nationally representative electronic medical records database. Smoking history was assessed through technology-enabled abstraction and confirmed for never smokers via chart review. Genomic characteristics of never smoker patients with SCLC were examined with the use of a next-generation sequencing-based gene panel and whole exome sequencing. RESULTS: One hundred of 5,632 patients (1.8%) with SCLC were never smokers. Relative to smokers, never smokers were more likely to be female (66.0% vs 52.4%; P = .009) and present with extensive stage (70.0% vs 62.2%; P = .028). Never smokers had a higher proportion of patients in age groups 35 to 49 years (7.0% vs 3.0%; P = .006) and ≥80 years (17.0% vs 8.2%; P = .006). Known risk factors for lung cancer were found in <20% of never smokers. There were no overall survival differences between never smokers and smokers. Among patients with available genomic data (n = 9), never smoker SCLC were characterized by lower tumor mutational burden, a lower frequency of TP53 mutations, and an absence of mutational signatures related to tobacco exposure. INTERPRETATION: The sex- and age-specific distribution of SCLC among never smokers, along with differences that were identified by genomic analyses, suggests a distinct biology of SCLC in never smokers compared with smokers.